Paper detail

Magnetic hyperthermia experiments with magnetic nanoparticles in clarified butter oil and paraffin: a thermodynamic analysis

In Specific Power Absorption (SPA) models for Magnetic Fluid Hyperthermia (MFH) experiments, the magnetic relaxation time of the nanoparticles (NPs) is known to be a fundamental descriptor of the heating mechanisms. The relaxation time is mainly determined by the interplay between the magnetic properties of the NPs and the rheological properties of NPs environment. Although the role of magnetism in MFH has been extensively studied, the thermal properties of the NPs medium and their changes during of MFH experiments have been so far underrated. Here, we show that ZnxFe3-xO4 NPs dispersed through different with phase transition in the temperature range of the experiment: clarified butter oil (CBO) and paraffin. These systems show non-linear behavior of the heating rate within the temperature range of the MFH experiments. For CBO, a fast increase at $306 K$ associated to changes in the viscosity (\texteta(T)) and specific heat (c_p(T)) of the medium below and above its melting temperature. This increment in the heating rate takes place around $318 K$ for paraffin. Magnetic and morphological characterizations of NPs together with the observed agglomeration of the nanoparticles above $306 K$ indicate that the fast increase in MFH curves could not be associated to a change in the magnetic relaxation mechanism, with Néel relaxation being dominant. In fact, successive experiment runs performed up to temperatures below and above the CBO melting point resulted in different MFH curves due to agglomeration of NPs driven by magnetic field inhomogeneity during the experiments. Similar effects were observed for paraffin. Our results highlight the relevance of the NPs medium's thermodynamic properties for an accurate measurement of the heating efficiency for in vitro and in vivo environments, where the thermal properties are largely variable within the temperature window of MFH experiments.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.