Paper detail

Magnetic fields of active galactic nuclei and quasars with polarized broad H-alpha lines

We present estimates of magnetic field in a number of AGNs from the Spectropolarimetric atlas of Smith, Young & Robinson (2002) from the observed degrees of linear polarization and the positional angles of spectral lines (H-alpha) (broad line regions of AGNs) and nearby continuum. The observed polarization is lower than the Milne value in a non-magnetized atmosphere. We hypothesize that the polarized radiation escapes from optically thick magnetized accretion discs and is weakened by the Faraday rotation effect. This effect is able to explain both the value of the polarization and the position angle. We estimate the required magnetic field in the broad line region by using simple asymptotic analytical formulas for Milne's problem in magnetized atmosphere, which take into account the last scattering of radiation before escaping from the accretion disc. The polarization of a broad spectral line escaping from disc is described by the same mechanism. The characteristic features of polarization of a broad line is the minimum of the degree of polarization in the center of the line and continuous rotation of the position angle from one wing to another. These effects can be explained by existence of clouds in the left (velocity is directed to an observer) and the right (velocity is directed from an observer) parts of the orbit in a rotating keplerian magnetized accretion disc. The base of explanation is existence of azimuthal magnetic field in the orbit. The existence of normal component of magnetic field makes the picture of polarization asymmetric. The existence of clouds in left and right parts of the orbit with different emissions also give the contribution in asymmetry effect. Assuming a power-law dependence of the magnetic field inside the disc, we obtain the estimate of the magnetic field strength at first stable orbit near the central SMBH for a number of AGNs.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.