Paper detail

Magnetic fields and cosmic rays in clusters of galaxies

We argue that the observed correlation between the radio luminosity and the X-ray luminosity in radio emitting galaxy clusters implies that the radio emission is due to secondary electrons that are produced by p-p interactions and lose their energy by emitting synchrotron radiation in a strong magnetic field, B>(8πa T_{CMB}^4)^{1/2}\simeq 3\muG. We construct a simple model that naturally explains the correlation, and show that the observations provide stringent constraints on cluster magnetic fields and cosmic rays (CRs): Within the cores of clusters, the ratio beta_{core} between the CR energy (per logarithmic particle energy interval) and the thermal energy is beta_{core}\sim 2*10^{-4}; The source of these CRs is most likely the cluster accretion shock, which is inferred to deposit in CRs ~ 0.1 of the thermal energy it generates; The diffusion time of 100 GeV CRs over scales \gtrsim100 kpc is not short compared to the Hubble time; Cluster magnetic fields are enhanced by mergers to \gtrsim 1 % of equipartition, and decay (to <1 muG) on 1 Gyr time scales. The inferred value of beta_{core} implies that high energy gamma-ray emission from secondaries at cluster cores will be difficult to detect with existing and planned instruments.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.