Paper detail

Magnetic field topology of tau Sco. The uniqueness problem of Stokes V ZDI inversions

The early B-type star tau Sco exhibits an unusually complex, relatively weak surface magnetic field. Its topology was previously studied with the Zeeman Doppler imaging (ZDI) modelling of high-resolution circular polarisation (Stokes V) observations. Here we assess the robustness of the Stokes V ZDI reconstruction of the magnetic field geometry of tau Sco and explore the consequences of using different parameterisations of the surface magnetic maps. We succeeded in reproducing previously published magnetic field maps of tau Sco using both general harmonic expansion and a direct, pixel-based representation of the magnetic field. These maps suggest that the field topology of tau Sco is comprised of comparable contributions of the poloidal and toroidal magnetic components. At the same time, we also found that available Stokes V observations can be successfully fitted employing restricted harmonic expansions, by either neglecting the toroidal field altogether or linking the radial and horizontal components of the poloidal field as required by the widely used potential field extrapolation technique. These alternative modelling approaches lead to a stronger and topologically more complex surface field structure. The field distributions recovered with different ZDI options differ significantly, yielding indistinguishable Stokes V profiles but different linear polarisation (Stokes Q and U) signatures. Our investigation underscores the well-known problem of non-uniqueness of the Stokes V ZDI inversions. For the magnetic stars with properties similar to tau Sco (relatively complex field, slow rotation) the outcome of magnetic reconstruction depends sensitively on the adopted field parameterisation. Stokes Q and U spectropolarimetric observations represent the only way of breaking the degeneracy of surface magnetic field models.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.