Paper detail

Magnetic Field - Gas Density Relation and Observational Implications Revisited

We revisit the relation between magnetic-field strength ($B$) and gas density ($ρ$) for contracting interstellar clouds and fragments (or, cores), which is central in observationally determining the dynamical importance of magnetic fields in cloud evolution and star formation. Recently, it has been claimed that a relation $B \propto ρ^{2/3} $ is statistically preferred over $B \propto ρ^{1/2}$ in molecular clouds, when magnetic field detections and nondetections from Zeeman observations are combined. This finding has unique observational implications on cloud and core geometry: The relation $B \propto ρ^{2/3} $ can only be realized under spherical contraction. However, no indication of spherical geometry can be found for the objects used in the original statistical analysis of the $B-ρ$ relation. We trace the origin of the inconsistency to simplifying assumptions in the statistical model used to arrive at the $B\propto ρ^{2/3}$ conclusion and to an underestimate of observational uncertainties in the determination of cloud and core densities. We show that, when these restrictive assumptions are relaxed, $B \propto ρ^{1/2}$ is the preferred relation for the (self-gravitating) molecular-cloud data, as theoretically predicted four decades ago.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.