Paper detail

Magnetic-field dependence of count rates in superconducting thin-film TaN single-photon detectors

We have studied the magnetic-field dependence of both dark-count rates and photon-count rates in a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector made of TaN in external magnetic fields $|μ_0H| < 10$ mT perpendicular to the plane of the underlying meander structure and at $T = 4$ K. The dark-count rates show a characteristic field-dependence, which is asymmetric with respect to magnetic field direction. The field- and the current dependence of the dark counts can be quantitatively well explained if one assumes that the critical current is reduced to $\approx50%$ at the $180^\circ$ meander turns when compared to a straight strip, and the observed asymmetry can be modeled assuming that the turnarounds are not all strictly equal. Surprisingly, the photon count rates do not show any significant field dependence, which seems to be at odds with existing detection models invoking vortex crossings.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.