Paper detail

Magnetic effects on fields morphologies and reversals in geodynamo simulations

The dynamo effect is the most popular candidate to explain the non-primordial magnetic fields of astrophysical objects. Although many systematic studies of parameters have already been made to determine the different dynamical regimes explored by direct numerical geodynamo simulations, it is only recently that the regime corresponding to the outer core of the Earth characterized by a balance of forces between the Coriolis and Lorentz forces is accessible numerically. In most previous studies, the Lorentz force played a relatively minor role. For example, they have shown that a purely hydrodynamic parameter (the local Rossby number $Ro_\ell$ determines the stability domain of dynamos dominated by the axial dipole (dipolar dynamos). In this study, we show that this result cannot hold when the Lorentz force becomes dominant. We model turbulent geodynamo simulations with a strong Lorentz force by varying the important parameters over several orders of magnitude. This method enables us to question previous results and to argue on the applications of numerical dynamos in order to better understand the geodynamo problem. Strong dipolar fields considerably affect the kinetic energy distribution of convective motions which enables the maintenance of this field configuration. The relative importance of each force depends on the spatial length scale, whereas $Ro_\ell$ is a global output parameter which ignores the spatial dependency. We show that inertia does not induce a dipole collapse as long as the Lorentz and the Coriolis forces remain dominant at large length scales.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.