Paper detail

Magnetic activity and evolution of the four Hyades K giants

We determine the exact physical parameters of the four Hyades cluster K giants, using their parallaxes and atmospheric modeling of our red-channel TIGRE high-resolution spectra. Performing a comparison with well-tested evolutionary tracks, we derive exact masses and evolutionary stages. At an age of 588 ($\pm 60$) Myrs and with a metallicity of Z=0.03 (consistent with the spectroscopic abundances), we find HD~27371 and HD~28307, the two less bright K giants, at the onset of central helium-burning, entering their blue loops with a mass of 2.62 $M_{\odot}$, while the slightly brighter stars HD~28305 and HD~27697 are already exiting their blue loop. Their more advanced evolution suggests a higher mass of 2.75 $M_{\odot}$. Notably, this pairing coincides with the different activity levels, which we find for these four stars from chromospheric activity monitoring with TIGRE and archival Mount Wilson data as well as from ROSAT coronal detections: The two less evolved K giants are the far more active pair, and we confidently confirm their rotation with periods of about 142 days. This work therefore provides some first, direct evidence of magnetic braking during the 130~Myrs lasting phase of central helium-burning, similar to what has long been known to occur to cool main-sequence stars.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.