Paper detail

Magnetic activity and differential rotation in the young Sun-like stars KIC 7985370 and KIC 7765135

We present a detailed study of the two Sun-like stars KIC 7985370 and KIC 7765135, aimed at determining their activity level, spot distribution, and differential rotation. Both stars were discovered by us to be young stars and were observed by the NASA Kepler mission. The stellar parameters (vsini, spectral type, Teff, log g, and [Fe/H]) were derived from optical spectroscopy which allowed us also to study the chromospheric activity from the emission in the core of Hα and CaII IRT lines. The high-precision Kepler photometric data spanning over 229 days were then fitted with a robust spot model. Model selection and parameter estimation are performed in a Bayesian manner, using a Markov chain Monte Carlo method. Both stars came out to be Sun-like with an age of about 100-200 Myr, based on their lithium content and kinematics. Their youth is confirmed by the high level of chromospheric activity, comparable to that displayed by the early G-type stars in the Pleiades cluster. The flux ratio of the CaII-IRT lines suggests that the cores of these lines are mainly formed in optically-thick regions analogous to solar plages. The model of the light curves requires at least seven enduring spots for KIC 7985370 and nine spots for KIC 7765135 for a satisfactory fit. The assumption of longevity of the star spots, whose area is allowed to evolve in time, is at the heart of our approach. We found, for both stars, a rather high value of the equator-to-pole differential rotation (dΩ~0.18 rad/day) which is in contrast with the predictions of some mean-field models of differential rotation for fast-rotating stars. Our results are instead in agreement with previous works on solar-type stars and with other models which predict a higher latitudinal shear, increasing with equatorial angular velocity.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.