Paper detail

Magnetars vs. high magnetic field pulsars: a theoretical interpretation of the apparent dichotomy

Highly magnetized neutron stars (NSs) are characterized by a bewildering range of astrophysical manifestations. Here, building on our simulations of the evolution of magnetic stresses in the NS crust and its ensuing fractures (Perna & Pons 2011), we explore in detail, for the middle-age and old NSs, the dependence of starquake frequency and energetics on the relative strength of the poloidal (B_p) and toroidal (B_tor) components. We find that, for B_p >~10^{14}G, since a strong crustal toroidal field B_tor B_p is quickly formed on a Hall timescale, the initial toroidal field needs to be B_tor >> B_p to have a clear influence on the outbursting behaviour. For initial fields B_p <~ 10^{14}G, it is very unlikely that a middle-age (t~10^5 years) NS shows any bursting activity. This study allows us to solve the apparent puzzle of how NSs with similar dipolar magnetic fields can behave in a remarkably different way: an outbursting 'magnetar' with a high X-ray luminosity, or a quiet, low-luminosity, "high-$B$" radio pulsar. As an example, we consider the specific cases of the magnetar 1E2259+586 and the radio pulsar PSRJ1814-1744, which at present have a similar dipolar field ~6x10^{13}G. We determine for each object an initial magnetic field configuration that reproduces the observed timing parameters at their current age. The same two configurations also account for the differences in quiescent X-ray luminosity and for the 'magnetar/outbursting' behaviour of 1E2259+586 but not of PSRJ1814-1744. We further use the theoretically predicted surface temperature distribution to compute the light-curve for these objects. In the case of 1E2259+586, for which data are available, our predicted temperature distribution gives rise to a pulse profile whose double-peaked nature and modulation level is consistent with the observations.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.