Paper detail

Magnesium abundances in mildly metal-poor stars from different indicators

We present magnesium abundances derived from high resolution spectra using several Mg I and two high excitation Mg II lines for 19 metal-poor stars with [Fe/H] values between -1.1 and +0.2. The main goal is to search for systematic differences in the derived abundances between the two ionisation state lines. Our analysis shows that the one-dimensional LTE and N-LTE study finds a very good agreement between these features. The [Mg/Fe] vs. [Fe/H] relationship derived, despite the small sample of stars, is also in agreement with the classical figure of increasing [Mg/Fe] with decreasing metallicity. We find a significant scatter however, in the [Mg/Fe] ratio at [Fe/H]$\sim -0.6$ which is currently explained as a consequence of the overlap at this metallicity of thick and thin disk stars, which were probably formed from material with different nucleosynthesis histories. We speculate on the possible consequences of the agreement found between Mg I and Mg II lines on the very well known oxygen problem in metal-poor stars. We also study the [O/Mg] ratio in the sample stars using oxygen abundances from the literature and find that the current observations and nucleosynthetic predictions from type II supernovae disagree. We briefly discuss some alternatives to solve this discrepancy.

preprint2004arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.