Paper detail

Magic Three-Qubit Veldkamp Line and Veldkamp Space of the Doily

A magic three-qubit Veldkamp line of $W(5,2)$, i.\,e. the line comprising a hyperbolic quadric $\mathcal{Q}^+(5,2)$, an elliptic quadric $\mathcal{Q}^-(5,2)$ and a quadratic cone $\widehat{\mathcal{Q}}(4,2)$ that share a parabolic quadric $\mathcal{Q}(4,2)$, the doily, is shown to provide an interesting model for the Veldkamp space of the latter. The model is based on the facts that: a) the 20 off-doily points of $\mathcal{Q}^+(5,2)$ form ten complementary pairs, each corresponding to a unique grid of the doily; b) the 12 off-doily points of $\mathcal{Q}^-(5,2)$ form six complementary pairs, each corresponding to a unique ovoid of the doily; and c) the 15 off-doily points of $\widehat{\mathcal{Q}}(4,2)$ -- disregarding the nucleus of $\mathcal{Q}(4,2)$ -- are in bijection with the 15 perp-sets of the doily. These findings lead to a conjecture that also parapolar spaces can be relevant for quantum information.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.