Paper detail

MAGIC observations of the February 2014 flare of 1ES 1011+496 and ensuing constraint of the EBL density

In February-March 2014, the MAGIC telescopes observed the high-frequency peaked BL Lac 1ES 1011+496 (z=0.212) in flaring state at very-high energy (VHE, E>100GeV). The flux reached a level more than 10 times higher than any previously recorded flaring state of the source. We present the description of the characteristics of the flare presenting the light curve and the spectral parameters of the night-wise spectra and the average spectrum of the whole period. From these data we aim at detecting the imprint of the Extragalactic Background Light (EBL) in the VHE spectrum of the source, in order to constrain its intensity in the optical band. For this we implement the method developed by the H.E.S.S. collaboration in which the intrinsic energy spectrum of the source is modeled with a simple function, and the EBL-induced optical depth is calculated using a template EBL model. The likelihood of the observed spectrum is then maximized, including a normalization factor for the EBL opacity among the free parameters. From the data collected differential energy spectra was produced for all nights of the observed period. Evaluating the changes in the fit parameters we conclude that the spectral shape for most of the nights were compatible, regardless of the flux level, which enabled us to produce an average spectrum from which the EBL imprint could be constrained. The likelihood ratio test shows that the model with an EBL density 1.07(-0.20,+0.24)_{stat+sys}, relative to the one in the tested EBL template (Dominguez et al.2011), is preferred at the 4.6 sigma level to the no-EBL hypothesis, with the assumption that the intrinsic source spectrum can be modeled as a log-parabola. This would translate into a constraint of the EBL density in the wavelength range [0.24 um,4.25 um], with a peak value at 1.4 um of F=12.27_{-2.29}^{+2.75} nW m^{-2} sr^{-1}, including systematics.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
M. L. AhnenS. AnsoldiL. A. AntonelliP. AntoranzA. BabicB. BanerjeeP. BangaleU. Barres de AlmeidaJ. A. BarrioJ. Becerra GonzálezW. BednarekE. BernardiniB. BiasuzziA. BilO. BlanchS. BonnefoyG. BonnoliF. BorracciT. BretzE. CarmonaA. CarosiA. ChatterjeeR. ClaveroP. ColinE. ColomboJ. L. ContrerasJ. CortinaS. CovinoP. Da VelaF. DazziA. De AngelisB. De LottoE. de O na WilhelmiC. Delgado MendezF. Di PierroD. Dominis PresterD. DornerM. DoroS. EineckeD. Eisenacher GlawionD. ElsaesserA. Fernández-BarralD. FidalgoM. V. FonsecaL. FontK. FrantzenC. FruckD. GalindoR. J. García LópezM. GarczarczykD. Garrido TerratsM. GaugP. GiammariaN. GodinovicA. González MuñozD. GubermanA. HahnY. HanabataM. HayashidaJ. HerreraJ. HoseD. HrupecG. HughesW. IdecK. KodaniY. KonnoH. KuboJ. KushidaA. La BarberaD. LelasE. LindforsS. LombardiF. LongoM. LópezR. López-CotoA. López-OramasE. LorenzP. MajumdarM. MakarievK. MallotG. ManevaM. ManganaroK. MannheimL. MaraschiB. MarcoteM. MariottiM. MartínezD. MazinU. MenzelJ. M. MiraR. MirzoyanA. MoralejoE. MorettiD. NakajimaV. NeustroevA. NiedzwieckiM. Nievas RosilloK. NilssonK. NishijimaK. NodaR. OritoA. OverkempingS. PaianoJ. PalacioM. PalatielloD. PanequeR. PaolettiJ. M. ParedesX. Paredes-FortunyM. PersicJ. PoutanenP. G. Prada MoroniE. PriniI. PuljakW. RhodeM. RibóJ. RicoJ. Rodriguez GarciaT. SaitoK. SataleckaC. SchultzT. SchweizerS. N. ShoreA. SillanpaaJ. SitarekI. SnidaricD. SobczynskaA. StamerraT. SteinbringM. StrzysL. TakaloH. TakamiF. TavecchioP. TemnikovT. TerzicD. TescaroM. TeshimaJ. ThaeleD. F. TorresT. ToyamaA. TrevesV. VerguilovI. VovkJ. E. WardM. WillM. H. WuR. Zanin

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access147 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

M. L. AhnenS. AnsoldiL. A. AntonelliP. AntoranzA. BabicB. BanerjeeP. BangaleU. Barres de AlmeidaJ. A. BarrioJ. Becerra GonzálezW. BednarekE. BernardiniB. BiasuzziA. BilO. BlanchS. BonnefoyG. BonnoliF. BorracciT. BretzE. CarmonaA. CarosiA. ChatterjeeR. ClaveroP. ColinE. ColomboJ. L. ContrerasJ. CortinaS. CovinoP. Da VelaF. DazziA. De AngelisB. De LottoE. de O na WilhelmiC. Delgado MendezF. Di PierroD. Dominis PresterD. DornerM. DoroS. EineckeD. Eisenacher GlawionD. ElsaesserA. Fernández-BarralD. FidalgoM. V. FonsecaL. FontK. FrantzenC. FruckD. GalindoR. J. García LópezM. GarczarczykD. Garrido TerratsM. GaugP. GiammariaN. GodinovicA. González MuñozD. GubermanA. HahnY. HanabataM. HayashidaJ. HerreraJ. HoseD. HrupecG. HughesW. IdecK. KodaniY. KonnoH. KuboJ. KushidaA. La BarberaD. LelasE. LindforsS. LombardiF. LongoM. LópezR. López-CotoA. López-OramasE. LorenzP. MajumdarM. MakarievK. MallotG. ManevaM. ManganaroK. MannheimL. MaraschiB. MarcoteM. MariottiM. MartínezD. MazinU. MenzelJ. M. MiraR. MirzoyanA. MoralejoE. MorettiD. NakajimaV. NeustroevA. NiedzwieckiM. Nievas RosilloK. NilssonK. NishijimaK. NodaR. OritoA. OverkempingS. PaianoJ. PalacioM. PalatielloD. PanequeR. PaolettiJ. M. ParedesX. Paredes-FortunyM. PersicJ. PoutanenP. G. Prada MoroniE. PriniI. PuljakW. RhodeM. RibóJ. RicoJ. Rodriguez GarciaT. SaitoK. SataleckaC. SchultzT. SchweizerS. N. ShoreA. SillanpaaJ. SitarekI. SnidaricD. SobczynskaA. StamerraT. SteinbringM. StrzysL. TakaloH. TakamiF. TavecchioP. TemnikovT. TerzicD. TescaroM. TeshimaJ. ThaeleD. F. TorresT. ToyamaA. TrevesV. VerguilovI. VovkJ. E. WardM. WillM. H. WuR. Zanin

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.