Paper detail

Magic Messengers in Gauge Mediation and signal for 125 GeV boosted Higgs boson

We consider a renormalizable messenger sector with magic messenger fields instead of usual SU(5) complete multiplets. We derive the soft supersymmetry breaking terms and show that the gaugino sector can be parameterized by only two parameters. These parameters can be chosen appropriately to obtain various patterns of gaugino masses and different ratios among them. The sfermion sector can also be characterized by two independent parameters which can be adjusted to change the relative masses of squarks and sleptons. A judicious choice of parameters also allows us to achieve the lightest Higgs boson mass about 125 GeV. In this paper we focus on a scenario where a comparatively large hierarchy exists between the U(1) and SU(2) gaugino mass parameters. In such a case, the lightest Higgs boson originating from the decay of the next-to-lightest neutralino, following the direct production of chargino neutralino pair, can be considerably boosted. We show that a boosted Supersymmetric Higgs signal with a decent signal to background ratio can be obtained using the jet substructure technique at LHC with 8 TeV (14 TeV) center of mass energy and an integrated luminosity of about 30 fb$^{-1}$ (15 fb$^{-1}$).

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.