Paper detail

MAGIC: A Method for Assessing Cyber Incidents Occurrence

The assessment of cyber risk plays a crucial role for cybersecurity management, and has become a compulsory task for certain types of companies and organizations. This makes the demand for reliable cyber risk assessment tools continuously increasing, especially concerning quantitative tools based on statistical approaches. Probabilistic cyber risk assessment methods, however, follow the general paradigm of probabilistic risk assessment, which requires the magnitude and the likelihood of incidents as inputs. Unfortunately, for cyber incidents, the likelihood of occurrence is hard to estimate based on historical and publicly available data; so, expert evaluations are commonly used, which however leave space to subjectivity. In this paper, we propose a novel probabilistic model, called MAGIC (Method for AssessinG cyber Incidents oCcurrence), to compute the likelihood of occurrence of a cyber incident, based on the evaluation of the cyber posture of the target organization. This allows deriving tailor-made inputs for probabilistic risk assessment methods, like HTMA (How To Measure Anything in cybersecurity risk), FAIR (Factor Analysis of Information Risk) and others, thus considerably reducing the margin of subjectivity in the assessment of cyber risk. We corroborate our approach through a qualitative and a quantitative comparison with several classical methods.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.