Paper detail

Macroscopic locality with equal bias reproduces with high fidelity a quantum distribution achieving the Tsirelson's bound

Two physical principles, Macroscopic Locality (ML) and Information Causality (IC), so far, have been most successful in distinguishing quantum correlations from post-quantum correlations. However, there are also some post-quantum probability distributions which cannot be distinguished with the help of these principles. Thus, it is interesting to see whether consideration of these two principles, separately, along with some additional physically plausible constraints, can explain some interesting quantum features which are otherwise hard to reproduce. In this paper we show that, in a Bell-CHSH scenario, ML along with constraint of equal-biasness for the concerned observables, almost reproduces the quantum joint probability distribution corresponding to maximal quantum Bell violation, which is unique up to relabeling. From this example and earlier work of Cavalcanti, Salles and Scarani, we conclude that IC and ML are in-equivalent physical principles; satisfying one does not imply that the other is satisfied.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.