Paper detail

Macrolensing signatures of large-scale violations of the weak energy condition

We present a set of simulations of the macrolensing effects produced by large-scale cosmological violations of the energy conditions. These simulations show how the appearance of a background field of galaxies is affected when lensed by a region with an energy density equivalent to a negative mass ranging from $10^{12}$ to $10^{17}$ solar masses. We compare with the macrolensing results of equal amounts of positive mass, and show that, contrary to the usual case where tangential arc-like structures are expected, there appear radial arcs-runaway filaments-and a central void. These results make the cosmological macrolensing produced by space-time domains where the weak energy conditions is violated, observationally distinguishable from standard regions. Whether large domains with negative energy density indeed exist in the universe can now be decided by future observations of deep fields.

preprint2001arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.