Paper detail

Machine learning technique for morphological classification of galaxies from the SDSS. III. Image-based inference of detailed features

This paper follows series of our works on the applicability of various machine learning methods to the morphological galaxy classification (Vavilova et al., 2021, 2022). We exploited the sample of 315776 SDSS DR9 galaxies with absolute stellar magnitudes of -24m<Mr<-19.4m at 0.003<z<0.1 as a target data set for the CNN classifier based on the DenseNet-201. Because it is tightly overlapped with the Galaxy Zoo 2 (GZ2) sample, we use these annotated data as the training data set to classify galaxies into 34 detailed features. In the presence of a pronounced difference of visual parameters between galaxies from the GZ2 training data set and galaxies without known morphological parameters, we applied novel procedures, which allowed us for the first time to get rid of this difference for smaller and fainter SDSS galaxies. We describe in detail the adversarial validation technique as well as how we managed the optimal train-test split of galaxies from the training data set. We have also found optimal galaxy image transformations to increase the classifier generalization ability. It can be considered as another way to improve the human bias for those galaxy images that had a poor vote classification in the GZ project. Such an approach, likely auto-immunization, when the CNN classifier trained on very good images is able to retrain bad images from the same homogeneous sample, can be considered co-planar to other methods of combating the human bias. The accuracy of CNN classifier is in the range of 83.3-99.4 percent depending on 32 features. As a result, for the first time, we assigned the detailed morphological classification for more than 140K low-redshift galaxies, especially at the fainter end. We accentuate on the typical problem points of galaxy CNN image classification from the astronomical point of view. The catalogs will be available through the VizieR.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.