Paper detail

Machine-Learning-Assisted Investigation of the Diffusion of Hydrogen in Brine by Performing Molecular Dynamics Simulation

Deep saline aquifers are one of the best options for large-scale and long-term hydrogen storage. Predicting the diffusion coefficient of hydrogen molecules at the conditions of saline aquifers is critical for modelling hydrogen storage. The diffusion coefficient of hydrogen molecules in chloride brine with different cations ($\mathrm{Na}^+$, $\mathrm{K}^+$, $\mathrm{Ca}^{2+}$) containing up to 5 $\mathrm{mol/kg_{H_2O}}$ concentration is numerically investigated using molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. A wide range of pressure (1-218 atm) and temperature (298-648 K) conditions is applied to cover the realistic operational conditions of the aquifers. We find that the temperature, pressure and properties of ions (compositions and concentrations) affect the hydrogen diffusion coefficient. An Arrhenius behavior of the effect of temperature on the diffusion coefficient has been observed with the temperature independent parameters fitted using the ion concentration under constant pressure. However, it is noted that the pressure strongly affects the diffusive behavior of hydrogen at the high temperature ($\geq$ 400 K) regime, indicating the inaccuracy of the Arrhenius model. Hence, we combine the obtained MD results with four models of machine learning (ML), including linear regression (LR), random forest (RF), extra tree (ET) and gradient boosting (GB) to provide effective predictions on the hydrogen diffusion. The resultant combination of GB model with MD data predicts the diffusion of hydrogen more effectively as compared to the Arrhenius model and other ML models. Moreover, a $post hoc$ analysis (feature importance rank) has been performed to extract the correlation between physical descriptors and simulation results from ML models.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.