Paper detail

Machine learning and multivariate goodness of fit

Multivariate goodness-of-fit and two-sample tests are important components of many nuclear and particle physics analyses. While a variety of powerful methods are available if the dimensionality of the feature space is small, such tests rapidly lose power as the dimensionality increases and the data inevitably become sparse. Machine learning classifiers are powerful tools capable of reducing highly multivariate problems into univariate ones, on which commonly used tests such as $χ^2$ or Kolmogorov-Smirnov may be applied. We explore applying both traditional and machine-learning-based tests to several example problems, and study how the power of each approach depends on the dimensionality. A pedagogical discussion is provided on which types of problems are best suited to using traditional versus machine-learning-based tests, and on the how to properly employ the machine-learning-based approach.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.