Paper detail

Mach-like capillary-gravity wakes

We determine experimentally the angle $α$ of maximum wave amplitude in the far-field wake behind a vertical surface-piercing cylinder translated at constant velocity $U$ for Bond numbers $\mathrm{Bo}_D = D / λ_c$ ranging between 0.1 and 4.2, where $D$ is the cylinder diameter and $λ_c$ the capillary length. In all cases the wake angle is found to follow a Mach-like law at large velocity, $α\sim U^{-1}$, but with different prefactors depending on the value of $\mathrm{Bo}_D$. For small $\mathrm{Bo}_D$ (large capillary effects), the wake angle approximately follows the law $α\simeq c_{\rm g,min} / U$, where $c_{\rm g,min}$ is the minimum group velocity of capillary-gravity waves. For larger $\mathrm{Bo}_D$ (weak capillary effects), we recover a law $α\sim \sqrt{gD}/U$ similar to that found for ship wakes at large velocity [Rabaud and Moisy, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 110}, 214503 (2013)]. Using the general property of dispersive waves that the characteristic wavelength of the wavepacket emitted by a disturbance is of order of the disturbance size, we propose a simple model that describes the transition between these two Mach-like regimes as the Bond number is varied. We show that the new capillary law $α\simeq c_{\rm g,min} / U$ originates from the presence of a capillary cusp angle (distinct from the usual gravity cusp angle), along which the energy radiated by the disturbance accumulates for Bond numbers of order of unity. This model, complemented by numerical simulations of the surface elevation induced by a moving Gaussian pressure disturbance, is in qualitative agreement with experimental measurements.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.