Paper detail

M33 Cepheids from CFHT/MegaCAM survey

In this paper we analyze Sloan g,r,i archival imaging data of M33 taken by Hartman et al. (2006) using Megacam at the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope. To determine the distance to the M33 galaxy, we performed several analytical steps to identify its Cepheid population. We used the Lomb-Scargle algorithm to find periodicity and visually identified 1989 periodic variable stars. Since Cepheids occupy a specific region of the color-magnitude diagram, to differentiate Cepheids from other variables we used the expected position of the Cepheid instability strip to down-select Cepheids in M33 from other variables. This led to our sample of 1622 variables, the largest Cepheid sample known in M33 to date. We further classified these Cepheids into different subclasses, and used the fundamental mode Cepheids to estimate distance moduli for M33 in different filters: μ= 25.044+/-0.083 mag in the g filter, μ= 24.886+/-0.074 mag in the r filter, and μ= 24.785+/-0.068 mag for the i filter. These results are in agreement with previous results.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.