Paper detail

M - sigma relation between SMBHs and the velocity dispersion of globular cluster systems

We find evidence that the mass MBH of central supermassive black holes (SMBHs) correlates with the velocity dispersion sigma_GC of globular cluster systems of their host galaxies. This extends the well-known MBH - sigma_sph relation between black hole mass and velocity dispersion of the host spheroidal component. We compile published measurements of both MBH and sigma_GC for a sample of 13 systems and find the relation log(MBH) = alpha + beta log(sigma_GC/200) with alpha = 8.63 \pm 0.09 and beta = 3.76 \pm 0.52. We also consider blue (metal-poor) and red (metal-rich) globular clusters sub-populations separately and obtain a surprisingly tight correlation using only the velocity dispersion sigma_GC^red of the red clusters with alpha = 8.73 \pm 0.09 and beta = 3.84 \pm 0.52 and an intrinsic scatter eps_0 = 0.22 dex compared to eps_0 = 0.27 dex for the MBH - sigma_sph of our sample. We use our MBH - sigma_GC relation to estimate the central black hole mass in five galaxies for which sigma_GC^red is measured.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.