Paper detail

Lyndon words and Fibonacci numbers

It is a fundamental property of non-letter Lyndon words that they can be expressed as a concatenation of two shorter Lyndon words. This leads to a naive lower bound log_{2}(n)} + 1 for the number of distinct Lyndon factors that a Lyndon word of length n must have, but this bound is not optimal. In this paper we show that a much more accurate lower bound is log_{phi}(n) + 1, where phi denotes the golden ratio (1 + sqrt{5})/2. We show that this bound is optimal in that it is attained by the Fibonacci Lyndon words. We then introduce a mapping L_x that counts the number of Lyndon factors of length at most n in an infinite word x. We show that a recurrent infinite word x is aperiodic if and only if L_x >= L_f, where f is the Fibonacci infinite word, with equality if and only if f is in the shift orbit closure of f.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.