Paper detail

Lyman break galaxy close and interacting pairs at z ~ 3

To date, the identification of interactions at z ~ 3 and above has relied on morphological analysis. Here, we present five serendipitous spectroscopic z ~ 3 Lyman break galaxy (LBG) pairs with projected proper separations < 15 h^-1 kpc in our survey of nine separate Keck fields. The data consist of 140 of our highest signal-to-noise ratio LBG spectra and ~500 of our most confident colour-selected LBGs. We show that the pairs are composed of two distinct close and/or interacting LBGs from a detailed analysis of the rest-frame ultraviolet spectra and images. In addition, we show that the pair number and separation distribution is expected from (1) the angular correlation function when applied to our survey and ~2500 colour-selected LBGs from the literature and (2) an analysis of a carefully matched high-resolution hybrid numerical and analytical cosmological simulation. Because the spectroscopic slitlets have random orientations with respect to the close pairs on the sky, the serendipitous pairs provide an unbiased sampling of the underlying close pair fraction. Finally, we discover two Ly-a emitters (LAEs) in our slitlets and find that they reside within 50 projected h^-1 kpc of LBGs. In this work, we uncover a strong relationship between Ly-a emission and pair separation. All confirmed and all candidate LBG pairs with separations of < 15 projected h^-1 kpc exhibit Ly-a in emission and we find an overabundance of Ly-a emission in pairs with < 50 projected h^-1 kpc separations. This relationship suggests a picture in which a measurable fraction of the Ly-a emission of LBGs, and potentially LAEs, is generated via interaction mechanisms. As a result, serendipitous spectroscopic close pairs provide a unique means to help identify and study high-redshift galaxy interactions using conventional ground-based optical data.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.