Paper detail

Lyman alpha absorption at low redshifts and hot gas in galactic haloes

Motivated by recent observation of Lanzetta et al. that most luminous galaxies at low redshifts produce $\lya$ absorption at impact parameter $l\lsim 160 \kpch$, we propose that these absorbers are clouds confined by the pressure of ambient hot gas in galactic haloes. We determine the properties of this hot gas and of the absorption systems on the basis of observational and theoretical constraints. The absorbing clouds need to be replenished on about one orbital time ($\sim 10^9$ yrs) in the galactic halo. The pressure and temperature of the gas at radius $r\sim 100\kpc$ are $P=(10-100){\rm cm^{-3} K}$, $T=10^{(5.5-6.5)}{\rm K}$. The model requires that about 10 per cent of the gas in low-redshift galactic haloes is in the hot phase. Such gas in galactic haloes emits x-ray with bolometric luminosity of the order $10^{37-40}{\rm erg\,s^{-1}}$. The plausibility for such gas to exist in current models of galaxy formation is discussed.

preprint1994arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.