Paper detail

Lyα Equivalent Width Distribution of Lyα Emitting Galaxies at Redshift z $\sim$ 4.5

Lyα line EWs provide important clues to the physical nature of high redshift LAEs. However, measuring the Lyα EW distribution of high-z narrowband selected LAEs can be hard because many sources do not have broadband photometry. We investigate the possible biases in measuring the intrinsic Lyα EW distribution for a LAE sample at z $\sim$ 4.5 in the Extended CDFS. Only weak Malmquist-type bias in both the intrinsic Lyα luminosity function and the Lyα EW distribution were found. However, the observed EW distribution is severely biased if one only considers LAEs with detections in the continuum. Taking the broadband non-detections into account requires fitting the distribution of the broadband-to-narrowband ratio, which then gives a larger EW distribution scale length. Assuming an exponential form of the intrinsic Lyα EW distribution dN/dEW = N exp(-EW/W$_0$), we obtain W$_0$ = 167+/-44Å (uncorrected for IGM absorption of Lyα). We discuss the likely range of IGM absorption effects in light of recent measurements of Lyα line profiles and velocity offsets. Our data are consistent with Lyα EW being independent of UV luminosity (i.e., we do not see evidence for the "Ando" effect). Our simulations also imply that broad-band images should be 0.5-1 magnitude deeper than narrowband images for an effective and reasonably complete LAE survey. Comparing with consistent measurements at other redshifts, we see a strong evolution in Lyα EW distribution with redshift which goes as a power-law form of W$_0$ $\prop$(1+z)$^$ξ, with ξ = 1.1$\pm$0.1 (0.6$\pm$0.1) if no IGM corrections are applied to the Lyα line; or ξ = 1.7$\pm$0.1 (1.2$\pm$0.1) after applying a maximal IGM-absorption correction to Lyα line) for an exponential (a gaussian) EW distribution from z = 0.3 to 6.5.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.