Paper detail

Lunar Laser Ranging constraints on nonminimally coupled dark energy and standard sirens

In dark energy models where a scalar field $ϕ$ is coupled to the Ricci scalar $R$ of the form $e^{-2Q (ϕ-ϕ_0)/M_{\rm pl}}R$, where $Q$ is a coupling constant, $ϕ_0$ is today's value of $ϕ$, and $M_{\rm pl}$ is the reduced Planck mass, we study how the recent Lunar Laser Ranging (LLR) experiment places constraints on the nonminimal coupling from the time variation of gravitational coupling. Besides a potential of the light scalar responsible for cosmic acceleration, we take a cubic Galileon term into account to suppress fifth forces in over-density regions of the Universe. Even if the scalar-matter interaction is screened by the Vainshtein mechanism, the time variation of gravitational coupling induced by the cosmological background field $ϕ$ survives in the solar system. For a small Galileon coupling constant $β_3$, there exists a kinetically driven $ϕ$-matter-dominated-epoch ($ϕ$MDE) prior to cosmic acceleration. In this case, we obtain the stringent upper limit $Q \le 3.4 \times 10^{-3}$ from the LLR constraint. For a large $β_3$ without the $ϕ$MDE, the coupling $Q$ is not particularly bounded from above, but the cosmological Vainshtein screening strongly suppresses the time variation of $ϕ$ such that the dark energy equation of state $w_{\rm DE}$ reaches the value close to $-1$ at high redshifts. We study the modified gravitational wave propagation induced by the nonminimal coupling to gravity and show that, under the LLR bound, the difference between the gravitational wave and luminosity distances does not exceed the order $10^{-5}$ over the redshift range $0<z<100$. In dark energy models where the Vainshtein mechanism is at work through scalar derivative self-interactions, it is difficult to probe the signature of nonminimal couplings from the observations of standard sirens.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.