Paper detail

Luminous hot accretion disks

We find a new two-temperature hot branch of equilibrium solutions for stationary accretion disks around black holes. In units of Eddington accretion rate defined as $10L_{\rm Edd}/c^2$, the accretion rates to which these solutions correspond are within the range $\dot{m}_1 \la \dot{m} \la 1$, here $\dot{m}_1$ is the critical rate of advecti$. In these solutions, the energy loss rate of the ions by Coulomb energy transfer between the ions and electrons is larger than the viscously heating rate and it is the advective heating together with the viscous dissipation that balances the Coulomb cooling of ions. When $\dot{m}_1 \la \dot{m} \la \dot{m}_2$, where $\dot{m}_2 \sim 5 \dot{m}_1 < 1$, the accretion flow remains hot throughout the disk. When $\dot{m}_2 \la \dot{m}\la 1$, Coulomb interaction will cool the inner region of the disk within a certain radius ($r_{\rm tr} \sim$ several -- tens of Schwarzschild radii or larger depending on the accretion rate and the outer boundary condition) and the disk will collapse onto the equatorial plane and form an optically thick cold annulus. Compared to ADAF, these hot solutions are much more luminous because of the high accretion rate and efficiency, therefore, we name them luminous hot accretion disks.

preprint2000arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.