Paper detail

Luminosity Distributions within Rich Clusters - I: A Ubiquitous Dwarf-Rich Luminosity Function ?

From deep CCD observations of the cluster Abell 2554 we have recovered the cluster's luminosity distribution over a wide range of magnitude (-24 < M(R) < -16). We compare the derived A2554 cluster luminosity function (at redshift 0.1) with that of the local Coma Cluster (A1656) and the more distant (z = 0.2) cluster A963. The distribution is remarkably similar for these three clusters of comparable richness and morphology. All show a flat (α= -1.0) luminosity function for the giant galaxies (-24 < M(R) < -19.5) which exhibits a sharp upturn (α= -1.7) at some intermediate magnitude (M(R) = -19) and continues to rise to the limits of existing data. We suggest that such a luminosity function may be ubiquitous among rich clusters and that a similar form may apply for poorer clusters and possibly the field as well. The three cluster dwarf LFs are seen over a range of lookback times covering a quarter of the age of the universe. Therefore the similarity between the three measured LFs seems to rule out strong evolution of the dwarf populations in rich cluster environments, at least out to z = 0.2, unless richness effects conspire to conceal evolutionary changes.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.