Luminosity distribution of Type II supernova progenitors

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Abstract

I present progenitor luminosities (LL) for a sample of 112 Type II supernovae (SNe II), computed directly from progenitor photometry and the bolometric correction technique, or indirectly from empirical correlations between progenitor luminosity and [OI] λλλλ6300, 6364 line luminosity at 350 d since explosion, 56^{56}Ni mass, or absolute VV-band magnitude at 50 d since explosion. To calibrate these correlations, I use twelve SNe II with progenitor luminosities measured from progenitor photometry. I find that the correlations mentioned above are strong and statistically significant, and allow to estimate progenitor luminosities to a precision between 20 and 24 per cent. I correct the SN sample for selection bias and define a subsample of 112 SNe II with progenitor luminosities between log⁡(L/L⊙)=4.6\log(L/L_{\odot})=4.6 dex, corresponding to the completeness limit of the corrected sample, and the maximum observed progenitor luminosity of log⁡(L/L⊙)=5.091\log(L/L_{\odot})=5.091 dex. The luminosity distribution for this subsample is statistically consistent with those for red supergiants (RSGs) in LMC, SMC, M31, and M33 with 4.6≤log⁡(L/L⊙)≤5.0914.6\leq\log(L/L_{\odot})\leq5.091. This supports that SN II progenitors correspond to RSGs. The conspicuous absence of SN II progenitors with log⁡(L/L⊙)>5.1\log(L/L_{\odot})>5.1 dex with respect to what is observed in RSG luminosity distributions, known as the RSG problem, is significant at a 5.2±0.5 σ5.2\pm0.5\,σ level.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.