Paper detail

LUDB: a new open-access validation tool for electrocardiogram delineation algorithms

We report Lobachevsky University Database (LUDB) of ECG signals, an open tool for validating ECG delineation algorithms, that is superior to the existing publicly available data bases in several aspects. LUDB contains 200 recordings of 10-second 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECG) from different subjects, representative of a variety of signal morphologies. The boundaries and peaks of QRS complexes and P and T waves are manually annotated by cardiologists for all recordings and independently for each lead, and all records received an expert classification by abnormalities. We present a case study for the recently proposed wavelet-based algorithm and the broadly used ecg-kit tool, and demonstrate the advantage of multi-lead ECG data analysis. LUDB contributes to the diversity of public databases employed in developing and validating novel ECG analysis algorithms, including the most advanced based on deep learning neural networks.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.