Paper detail

Lowering the hydrogen desorption temperature of NH3BH3 through B-group substitutions

We present ab initio results for substitutions in the promising hydrogen-storage material NH3BH3 to lower its hydrogen desorption temperature. Substitutions have already been investigated with significant success recently, but in all cases a less electronegative element is substituted for the protic hydrogen in the NH3 group of NH3BH3. We propose a different route, substituting th ehydridic hydrogen in the BH3 group with a more electronegative element. To keep the gravimetric density high, we focus on the second period elements C, N, O, and F, all with higher electronegativity compared to H. In addition, we investigate Cu and S as possible substitutions. Our main results include Bader charge analyses, hydrogen binding energies, and kinetic barriers for the hydrogen release reaction in the gas phase as well as in the solid. While the different substituents show varying effects on the kinetic barrier and thus desorption temperature - some overshoot our goal while others have little effect - we identify Cu as a very promising substituent, which lowers the reaction barrier by approximately 37% compared to NH3BH3 and thus significantly influences the hydrogen desorption temperature.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.