Paper detail

Lower Error Bounds for Randomized Multilevel and Changing Dimension Algorithms

We provide lower error bounds for randomized algorithms that approximate integrals of functions depending on an unrestricted or even infinite number of variables. More precisely, we consider the infinite-dimensional integration problem on weighted Hilbert spaces with an underlying anchored decomposition and arbitrary weights. We focus on randomized algorithms and the randomized worst case error. We study two cost models for function evaluation which depend on the number of active variables of the chosen sample points. Multilevel algorithms behave very well with respect to the first cost model, while changing dimension algorithms and also dimension-wise quadrature methods, which are based on a similar idea, can take advantage of the more generous second cost model. We prove the first non-trivial lower error bounds for randomized algorithms in these cost models and demonstrate their quality in the case of product weights. In particular, we show that the randomized changing dimension algorithms provided in [L. Plaskota, G. W. Wasilkowski, J. Complexity 27 (2011), 505--518] achieve convergence rates arbitrarily close to the optimal convergence rate.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.