Paper detail

Lower Complexity Bounds for Minimizing Regularized Functions

In this paper, we establish lower bounds for the oracle complexity of the first-order methods minimizing regularized convex functions. We consider the composite representation of the objective. The smooth part has Hölder continuous gradient of degree $ν\in [0, 1]$ and is accessible by a black-box local oracle. The composite part is a power of a norm. We prove that the best possible rate for the first-order methods in the large-scale setting for Euclidean norms is of the order $O(k^{- p(1 + 3ν) / (2(p - 1 - ν))})$ for the functional residual, where $k$ is the iteration counter and $p$ is the power of regularization. Our formulation covers several cases, including computation of the Cubically regularized Newton step by the first-order gradient methods, in which case the rate becomes $O(k^{-6})$. It can be achieved by the Fast Gradient Method. Thus, our result proves the latter rate to be optimal. We also discover lower complexity bounds for non-Euclidean norms.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.