Lower Bounds on Query Complexity for Testing Bounded-Degree CSPs

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Abstract

In this paper, we consider lower bounds on the query complexity for testing CSPs in the bounded-degree model. First, for any ``symmetric'' predicate P:0,1k→0,1P:{0,1}^{k} \to {0,1} except \equ where k≥3k\geq 3, we show that every (randomized) algorithm that distinguishes satisfiable instances of CSP(P) from instances (∣P−1(0)∣/2k−ε)(|P^{-1}(0)|/2^k-ε)-far from satisfiability requires Ω(n1/2+δ)Ω(n^{1/2+δ}) queries where nn is the number of variables and δ>0δ>0 is a constant that depends on PP and εε. This breaks a natural lower bound Ω(n1/2)Ω(n^{1/2}), which is obtained by the birthday paradox. We also show that every one-sided error tester requires Ω(n)Ω(n) queries for such PP. These results are hereditary in the sense that the same results hold for any predicate QQ such that P−1(1)⊆Q−1(1)P^{-1}(1) \subseteq Q^{-1}(1). For EQU, we give a one-sided error tester whose query complexity is O~(n1/2)\tilde{O}(n^{1/2}). Also, for 2-XOR (or, equivalently E2LIN2), we show an Ω(n1/2+δ)Ω(n^{1/2+δ}) lower bound for distinguishing instances between εε-close to and (1/2−ε)(1/2-ε)-far from satisfiability. Next, for the general k-CSP over the binary domain, we show that every algorithm that distinguishes satisfiable instances from instances (1−2k/2k−ε)(1-2k/2^k-ε)-far from satisfiability requires Ω(n)Ω(n) queries. The matching NP-hardness is not known, even assuming the Unique Games Conjecture or the dd-to-11 Conjecture. As a corollary, for Maximum Independent Set on graphs with nn vertices and a degree bound dd, we show that every approximation algorithm within a factor $d/\poly\log d$ and an additive error of εnεn requires Ω(n)Ω(n) queries. Previously, only super-constant lower bounds were known.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.