Lower bounds on maximal determinants of binary matrices via the probabilistic method

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Abstract

Let D(n)D(n) be the maximal determinant for n×nn \times n {±1}\{\pm 1\}-matrices, and R(n)=D(n)/nn/2{\mathcal R}(n) = D(n)/n^{n/2} be the ratio of D(n)D(n) to the Hadamard upper bound. We give several new lower bounds on R(n){\mathcal R}(n) in terms of dd, where n=h+dn = h+d, hh is the order of a Hadamard matrix, and hh is maximal subject to h≤nh \le n. A relatively simple bound is R(n)≥(2πe)d/2(1−d2(π2h)1/2)   for all   n≥1.{\mathcal R}(n) \ge \left(\frac{2}{πe}\right)^{d/2} \left(1 - d^2\left(\fracπ{2h}\right)^{1/2}\right) \;\text{ for all }\; n \ge 1. An asymptotically sharper bound is R(n)≥(2πe)d/2exp⁡(d(π2h)1/2+  O(d5/3h2/3)).{\mathcal R}(n) \ge \left(\frac{2}{πe}\right)^{d/2} \exp\left(d\left(\fracπ{2h}\right)^{1/2} + \; O\left(\frac{d^{5/3}}{h^{2/3}}\right)\right). We also show that R(n)≥(2πe)d/2{\mathcal R}(n) \ge \left(\frac{2}{πe}\right)^{d/2} if n≥n0n \ge n_0 and n0n_0 is sufficiently large, the threshold n0n_0 being independent of dd, or for all n≥1n\ge 1 if 0≤d≤30 \le d \le 3 (which would follow from the Hadamard conjecture). The proofs depend on the probabilistic method, and generalise previous results that were restricted to the cases d=0d=0 and d=1d=1.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.