Abstract

We continue a sequence of recent works studying Ramsey functions for semialgebraic predicates in Rd\mathbb{R}^d. A kk-ary semialgebraic predicate Φ(x1,…,xk)Φ(x_1,\ldots,x_k) on Rd\mathbb{R}^d is a Boolean combination of polynomial equations and inequalities in the kdkd coordinates of kk points x1,…,xk∈Rdx_1,\ldots,x_k\in\mathbb{R}^d. A sequence P=(p1,…,pn)P=(p_1,\ldots,p_n) of points in Rd\mathbb{R}^d is called ΦΦ-homogeneous if either Φ(pi1,…,pik)Φ(p_{i_1}, \ldots,p_{i_k}) holds for all choices 1≤i1<⋯<ik≤n1\le i_1 < \cdots < i_k\le n, or it holds for no such choice. The Ramsey function RΦ(n)R_Φ(n) is the smallest NN such that every point sequence of length NN contains a ΦΦ-homogeneous subsequence of length nn. Conlon, Fox, Pach, Sudakov, and Suk constructed the first examples of semialgebraic predicates with the Ramsey function bounded from below by a tower function of arbitrary height: for every k≥4k\ge 4, they exhibit a kk-ary ΦΦ in dimension 2k−42^{k-4} with RΦR_Φ bounded below by a tower of height k−1k-1. We reduce the dimension in their construction, obtaining a kk-ary semialgebraic predicate ΦΦ on Rk−3\mathbb{R}^{k-3} with RΦR_Φ bounded below by a tower of height k−1k-1. We also provide a natural geometric Ramsey-type theorem with a large Ramsey function. We call a point sequence PP in Rd\mathbb{R}^d order-type homogeneous if all (d+1)(d+1)-tuples in PP have the same orientation. Every sufficiently long point sequence in general position in Rd\mathbb{R}^d contains an order-type homogeneous subsequence of length nn, and the corresponding Ramsey function has recently been studied in several papers. Together with a recent work of Bárány, Matoušek, and Pór, our results imply a tower function of Ω(n)Ω(n) of height dd as a lower bound, matching an upper bound by Suk up to the constant in front of nn.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.