Paper detail

Lower bounds for the error decay incurred by coarse quantization schemes

Several analog-to-digital conversion methods for bandlimited signals used in applications, such as Sigma Delta quantization schemes, employ coarse quantization coupled with oversampling. The standard mathematical model for the error accrued from such methods measures the performance of a given scheme by the rate at which the associated reconstruction error decays as a function of the oversampling ratio L > 1. It was recently shown that exponential accuracy of the form O(2(-r L)) can be achieved by appropriate one-bit Sigma Delta modulation schemes. However, the best known achievable rate constants r in this setting differ significantly from the general information theoretic lower bound. In this paper, we provide the first lower bound specific to coarse quantization, thus narrowing the gap between existing upper and lower bounds. In particular, our results imply a quantitative correspondence between the maximal signal amplitude and the best possible error decay rate. Our method draws from the theory of large deviations.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.