Paper detail

Lower bounds for independence and $k$-independence number of graphs using the concept of degenerate degrees

Let $G$ be a graph and $v$ any vertex of $G$. We define the degenerate degree of $v$, denoted by $ζ(v)$ as $ζ(v)={\max}_{H: v\in H}~δ(H)$, where the maximum is taken over all subgraphs of $G$ containing the vertex $v$. We show that the degenerate degree sequence of any graph can be determined by an efficient algorithm. A $k$-independent set in $G$ is any set $S$ of vertices such that $Δ(G[S])\leq k$. The largest cardinality of any $k$-independent set is denoted by $α_k(G)$. For $k\in \{1, 2, 3\}$, we prove that $α_{k-1}(G)\geq {\sum}_{v\in G} \min \{1, 1/(ζ(v)+(1/k))\}$. Using the concept of cheap vertices we strengthen our bound for the independence number. The resulting lower bounds improve greatly the famous Caro-Wei bound and also the best known bounds for $α_1(G)$ and $α_2(G)$ for some families of graphs. We show that the equality in our bound for independence number happens for a large class of graphs. Our bounds are achieved by Cheap-Greedy algorithms for $α_k(G)$ which are designed by the concept of cheap sets. At the end, a bound for $α_k(G)$ is presented, where $G$ is a forest and $k$ an arbitrary non-negative integer.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.