Paper detail

Lower Bounds for Caching with Delayed Hits

Caches are a fundamental component of latency-sensitive computer systems. Recent work of [ASWB20] has initiated the study of delayed hits: a phenomenon in caches that occurs when the latency between the cache and backing store is much larger than the time between new requests. We present two results for the delayed hits caching model. (1) Competitive ratio lower bound. We prove that the competitive ratio of the algorithm in [ASWB20], and more generally of any deterministic online algorithm for delayed hits, is at least Omega(kZ), where k is the cache size and Z is the delay parameter. (2) Antimonotonicity of the delayed hits latency. Antimonotonicity is a naturally desirable property of cache latency: having a cache hit instead of a cache miss should result in lower overall latency. We prove that the latency of the delayed hits model is not antimonotone by exhibiting a scenario where having a cache hit instead of a miss results in an increase in overall latency. We additionally present a modification of the delayed hits model that makes the latency antimonotone.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.