Paper detail

Lower bounds for artificial neural network approximations: A proof that shallow neural networks fail to overcome the curse of dimensionality

Artificial neural networks (ANNs) have become a very powerful tool in the approximation of high-dimensional functions. Especially, deep ANNs, consisting of a large number of hidden layers, have been very successfully used in a series of practical relevant computational problems involving high-dimensional input data ranging from classification tasks in supervised learning to optimal decision problems in reinforcement learning. There are also a number of mathematical results in the scientific literature which study the approximation capacities of ANNs in the context of high-dimensional target functions. In particular, there are a series of mathematical results in the scientific literature which show that sufficiently deep ANNs have the capacity to overcome the curse of dimensionality in the approximation of certain target function classes in the sense that the number of parameters of the approximating ANNs grows at most polynomially in the dimension $d \in \mathbb{N}$ of the target functions under considerations. In the proofs of several of such high-dimensional approximation results it is crucial that the involved ANNs are sufficiently deep and consist a sufficiently large number of hidden layers which grows in the dimension of the considered target functions. It is the topic of this work to look a bit more detailed to the deepness of the involved ANNs in the approximation of high-dimensional target functions. In particular, the main result of this work proves that there exists a concretely specified sequence of functions which can be approximated without the curse of dimensionality by sufficiently deep ANNs but which cannot be approximated without the curse of dimensionality if the involved ANNs are shallow or not deep enough.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.