Paper detail

Lower Bounds for Adaptive Sparse Recovery

We give lower bounds for the problem of stable sparse recovery from /adaptive/ linear measurements. In this problem, one would like to estimate a vector $x \in \R^n$ from $m$ linear measurements $A_1x,..., A_mx$. One may choose each vector $A_i$ based on $A_1x,..., A_{i-1}x$, and must output $x*$ satisfying |x* - x|_p \leq (1 + ε) \min_{k\text{-sparse} x'} |x - x'|_p with probability at least $1-δ>2/3$, for some $p \in \{1,2\}$. For $p=2$, it was recently shown that this is possible with $m = O(\frac{1}εk \log \log (n/k))$, while nonadaptively it requires $Θ(\frac{1}εk \log (n/k))$. It is also known that even adaptively, it takes $m = Ω(k/ε)$ for $p = 2$. For $p = 1$, there is a non-adaptive upper bound of $\tilde{O}(\frac{1}{\sqrtε} k\log n)$. We show: * For $p=2$, $m = Ω(\log \log n)$. This is tight for $k = O(1)$ and constant $ε$, and shows that the $\log \log n$ dependence is correct. * If the measurement vectors are chosen in $R$ "rounds", then $m = Ω(R \log^{1/R} n)$. For constant $ε$, this matches the previously known upper bound up to an O(1) factor in $R$. * For $p=1$, $m = Ω(k/(\sqrtε \cdot \log k/ε))$. This shows that adaptivity cannot improve more than logarithmic factors, providing the analog of the $m = Ω(k/ε)$ bound for $p = 2$.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.