Paper detail

Low X-ray emission challenges supernovae remnants as the source of cosmic-ray electrons

The X-ray synchrotron emission of each of the young supernova-remnants (SNRs) SN1006, Kepler, Tycho, RCW86 and Cas A, is roughly given by $νL_ν\sim 10^{45}\rm{erg}/t$, where $t$ is the remnant's age. The electrons emitting the X-ray emission cool fast, implying that the X-ray emission is calorimetric and equal to half of the cosmic ray (CR) electron acceleration efficiency (per logarithmic interval of particle energies, at multi TeV energies). Assuming Sedov-Taylor expansion, the resulting CR electron yield per SNR is estimated to be $E^2dN_e/dE\approx 6νL_νt \sim 10^{46}\rm erg$. This is about two orders of magnitudes below the required amount for explaining the observed electron CRs at $E\sim 10\rm GeV$. Possible resolutions are 1. a soft acceleration spectrum allowing much more energy at $E\sim 10\rm GeV$ compared to $E\sim 10\rm TeV$, 2. an increased acceleration efficiency at later phases of the SNR evolution (unlikely), or 3. SNRs are not the source of CR electrons.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.