Paper detail

Low Tensor Train- and Low Multilinear Rank Approximations for De-speckling and Compression of 3D Optical Coherence Tomography Images

This paper proposes low tensor-train (TT) rank and low multilinear (ML) rank approximations for de-speckling and compression of 3D optical coherence tomography (OCT) images for a given compression ratio (CR). To this end, we derive the alternating direction method of multipliers based algorithms for the related problems constrained with the low TT- and low ML rank. Rank constraints are implemented through the Schatten-p (Sp) norm, p e {0, 1/2, 2/3, 1}, of unfolded matrices. We provide the proofs of global convergence towards a stationary point for both algorithms. Rank adjusted 3D OCT image tensors are finally approximated through tensor train- and Tucker alternating least squares decompositions. We comparatively validate the low TT- and low ML rank methods on twenty-two 3D OCT images with the JPEG2000 and 3D SPIHT compression methods, as well as with no compression 2D bilateral filtering (BF), 2D median filtering (MF), and enhanced low-rank plus sparse matrix decomposition (ELRpSD) methods. For the CR<10, the low Sp TT rank method with pe{0, 1/2, 2/3} yields either highest or comparable signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and comparable or better contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), mean segmentation errors (SEs) of retina layers and expert-based image quality score (EIQS) than original image and image compression methods. It compares favorably in terms of CNR, fairly in terms of SE and EIQS with the no image compression methods. Thus, for CR<10 the low S2/3 TT rank approximation can be considered a good choice for visual inspection based diagnostics. For 2<CR<60, the low S1 ML rank method compares favorably in terms of SE with image compression methods and with 2D BF and ELRpSD. It is slightly inferior to 2D MF. Thus, for 2<CR<60, the low S1 ML rank approximation can be considered a good choice for segmentation based diagnostics either on-site or in the remote mode of operation.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.