Paper detail

Low regularity estimates of the Lie-Totter time-splitting Fourier spectral method for the logarithmic Schrödinger equation

In this paper, we conduct rigorous error analysis of the Lie-Totter time-splitting Fourier spectral scheme for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation with a logarithmic nonlinear term $f(u)=u\ln|u|^2$ (LogSE) and periodic boundary conditions on a $d$-dimensional torus $\mathbb T^d$. Different from existing works based on regularisation of the nonlinear term $ f(u)\approx f^\varepsilon(u)=u\ln (|u| + \varepsilon )^2,$ we directly discretize the LogSE with the understanding $f(0)=0.$ Remarkably, in the time-splitting scheme, the solution flow map of the nonlinear part: $g(u)= u {\rm e}^{-{\rm} i t \ln|u|^{2}}$ has a higher regularity than $f(u)$ (which is not differentiable at $u=0$ but Hölder continuous), where $g(u)$ is Lipschitz continuous and possesses a certain fractional Sobolev regularity with index $0<s<1$. Accordingly, we can derive the $L^2$-error estimate: $O\big((τ^{s/2} + N^{-s})\ln\! N\big)$ of the proposed scheme for the LogSE with low regularity solution $u\in C((0,T]; H^s( \mathbb{T}^d)\cap L^\infty( \mathbb{T}^d)).$ Moreover, we can show that the estimate holds for $s=1$ with more delicate analysis of the nonlinear term and the associated solution flow maps. Furthermore, we provide ample numerical results to demonstrate such a fractional-order convergence for initial data with low regularity. This work is the first one devoted to the analysis of splitting scheme for the LogSE without regularisation in the low regularity setting, as far as we can tell.

preprint2024arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.