Paper detail

Low-redundancy codes for correcting multiple short-duplication and edit errors

Due to its higher data density, longevity, energy efficiency, and ease of generating copies, DNA is considered a promising storage technology for satisfying future needs. However, a diverse set of errors including deletions, insertions, duplications, and substitutions may arise in DNA at different stages of data storage and retrieval. The current paper constructs error-correcting codes for simultaneously correcting short (tandem) duplications and at most $p$ edits, where a short duplication generates a copy of a substring with length $\leq 3$ and inserts the copy following the original substring, and an edit is a substitution, deletion, or insertion. Compared to the state-of-the-art codes for duplications only, the proposed codes correct up to $p$ edits (in addition to duplications) at the additional cost of roughly $8p(\log_q n)(1+o(1))$ symbols of redundancy, thus achieving the same asymptotic rate, where $q\ge 4$ is the alphabet size and $p$ is a constant. Furthermore, the time complexities of both the encoding and decoding processes are polynomial when $p$ is a constant with respect to the code length.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.