Paper detail

Low-$n$ global ideal MHD instabilities in CFETR baseline scenario

This article reports an evaluation on the linear ideal magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) stability of the China Fusion Engineering Test Reactor (CFETR) baseline scenario for various first-wall locations. The initial-value code NIMROD and eigen-value code AEGIS are employed in this analysis. A good agreement is achieved between two codes in the growth rates of $n=1-10$ ideal MHD modes for various locations of the perfect conducting first-wall. The higher-$n$ modes are dominated by ballooning modes and localized in the pedestal region, while the lower-$n$ modes have more prominent external kink components and broader mode profiles. The influences of plasma-vacuum profile and wall shape are also examined using NIMROD. In presence of resistive wall, the low-$n$ ideal MHD instabilities are further studied using AEGIS. For the designed first-wall location, the $n = 1$ resistive wall mode (RWM) is found unstable, which could be fully stabilized by uniform toroidal rotation above 2.9\% core Alfvén speed.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.