Paper detail

Low-mass normal-matter atmospheres of strange stars and their radiation

The quark surface of a strange star has a very low emissivity for X-ray photons. I find that a small amount of normal matter at the quark surface with temperature in the range $10^7\la T_{_S}} \ll mc^2/k\simeq 6\times 10^9$ K is enough to produce X-rays with high luminosity, $L_X\simeq 10^{32}- 10^{34}(ΔM/10^{-22}M_\odot)^2 erg s^{-1}$. For the total atmosphere mass $ΔM\sim (10^{-20}-10^{-19})M_\odot$, this luminosity may be as high as the Eddington limit. The mean energy of X-ray photons which are radiated from such a low-mass atmosphere of a strange star is $\sim 10^2(T_S/10^8 K)^{0.45} \simeq 30-300$ times larger than the mean energy of X-ray photons which are radiated from the surface of both a neutron star and a strange star with a massive normal-matter envelope, $ΔM\sim 10^{-5}M_\odot$, for a fixed temperature at the stellar core. This raises the possibility that some black hole candidates with hard X-ray spectra are, in fact, such strange stars with a low-mass atmosphere. The X-ray emission from single strange stars is estimated.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.