Paper detail

Low-mass galaxy formation in cosmological AMR simulations: the effects of varying the sub-grid physics parameters

We present numerical simulations aimed at exploring the effects of varying the sub-grid physics parameters on the evolution and the properties of the galaxy formed in a low-mass dark matter halo (~7 times 10^10 Msun/h at redshift z=0). The simulations are run within a cosmological setting with a nominal resolution of 218 pc comoving and are stopped at z = 0.43. In all of our simulations, an extended old/intermediate-age stellar halo and a more compact younger stellar disk are formed. We found that a non negligible fraction of the halo stars are formed in situ in a spheroidal distribution. Changes in the sub-grid physics parameters affect significantly and in a complex way the evolution and properties of the galaxy: (i) Lower threshold densities nsf produce larger stellar effective radii Re, less peaked circular velocity curves V_c(R), and greater amounts of low-density and hot gas in the disk mid-plane; (ii) When stellar feedback is modeled by temporarily switching off radiative cooling in the star forming regions, Re increases (by a factor of ~ 2 in our particular model), the circular velocity curve becomes flatter, and a complex multi-phase gaseous disk structure develops; (iii) A more efficient local conversion of gas mass to stars, measured by a stellar particle mass distribution biased toward larger values, increases the strength of the feedback energy injection -driving outflows and inducing burstier SF histories; iv) If feedback is too strong, gas loss by galactic outflows -which are easier to produce in low-mass galaxies- interrupts SF, whose history becomes episodic. The simulations exhibit two important shortcomings: the baryon fractions are higher, and the specific SF rates are much smaller, than observationally inferred values for redshifts ~ 0.4-1.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.